News

Retiring From the Bench, the Hon. Thérèse Wiley Dancks L’91 Leaves Legacy of Paying it Forward to Students at Syracuse Law

The Hon. Thérèse Wiley Dancks L’91 retired from the bench this February after a respected career that spanned several decades. Her accomplishments included serving as a federal magistrate judge for the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York since 2012, the first woman in this role; as a founding partner of the law firm of Gale & Dancks LLC with a focus on civil litigation and trial work; a highly involved member and leader of state, local, and specialty bar associations and community organizations, including past president of the Central New York Women’s Bar Association; and the recipient of numerous awards from Syracuse Law, legal organizations, and the Central New York community that reflect her contributions to the law.

Hon. Thérèse Wiley Dancks L’91 sitting at the Judges desk speaking into microphones.

Yet, despite all her achievements, Dancks believes one of her greatest has been mentoring law students and young lawyers, particularly women, as they navigate the legal field.

“It has been my mission throughout my career to pay it forward to the next generation of lawyers,” says Dancks, who has demonstrated that commitment at her alma mater, Syracuse University College of Law, by serving as a mentor to many and offering externships to numerous Syracuse Law students, as well as those at a few other law schools. 

She also credits her law clerks who always enthusiastically embraced helping the law students who worked in chambers.

Giving Back and Paying It Forward

Growing up in East Syracuse, New York, as the youngest of eight children, Dancks loved to read and always knew she wanted to help people. Her mother was an early influence, often sharing stories of her job as a court reporter. As an undergraduate at Le Moyne College, Dancks credits her father, who was a professor there, for encouraging her to explore her options and take business law classes. The experience sparked her interest, though she didn’t earn her J.D. from Syracuse Law until age 30. After reaching that milestone, Dancks became committed to helping others do the same.

“Right out of law school, I didn’t necessarily have the financial resources to give, so I gave my time to the College of Law. I always enjoyed talking to groups of students or speaking to them one-on-one, and I also helped to judge moot court and other competitions,” she explains. “I did this in the hope that students, particularly women, would see someone who graduated from the same law school they were attending had been successful and know they could do the same.”

While her career thrived, her commitment to Syracuse Law never wavered. When she became a judge, she continued to guide students at the College of Law.

Hon. Thérèse Wiley Dancks L’91 sitting on a panel with 3 other people speaking.

“I loved having student law clerks in my chambers because they are fresh and new, and it’s all very exciting to them,” she says. “It helped me from becoming jaded, and it was refreshing to see the law through young people’s eyes.”

“I give out my email and tell students to reach out to me. Or if they want to talk we go to lunch, although students never pay for lunch—that’s my rule,” she adds.

“I just ask that they pay it forward and be a mentor or role model for other law students and help them on their career paths. If that’s my legacy, that would be awesome.”

Dedication Earns Respect of Colleagues

Her dedication has not gone unnoticed by her colleagues, including the Hon. Deborah Karalunas L’82, administrative judge for the Fifth Judicial District and an adjunct professor at Syracuse Law.

“Her energy in support of others—particularly in advancing gender equality—is boundless,” says Karalunas, who also applauds Dancks’s commitment to the legal community through her work with the Central New York Women’s Bar Association, Vera House, and the Onondaga County Bar Association.  

Hon. Thérèse Wiley Dancks L’91 looking away with her hand over her heart.

“Her commitment to the legal community began when she was a new lawyer and never wavered. Thérèse has given students exposure to practical legal experience, and she has helped them hone written and analytical skills critical to their success,” she adds.

Student and Alumni Cherish Her Time and Attention

What gives Dancks the most satisfaction, however, is knowing she has made an impact on Syracuse Law students who will contribute to the legal field in their own unique ways.

During an oral advocacy competition, Grace Frey L’25 first saw Dancks as she confidently led the event and gave kind but solid feedback to students.

“When I learned of Judge Dancks I didn’t yet know what a magistrate judge did, but people at the law school spoke so highly of her that I knew I had to work for her,” says Frey.

She eventually secured a “very rewarding” clerkship with Dancks. “Despite her busy schedule, Judge Dancks was available to me, especially in helping me decide what type of law I wanted to pursue. Not all judges would take the time,” Frey says. “When I passed the bar, Judge Dancks called and asked how my new job was going. She inspired me 1,000% and instilled in me the importance of giving back as you move forward.”

Frey is now a term law clerk to the Hon. Debra C. Poplin and the Hon. Jill E. McCook in the Eastern District of Tennessee, and she credits Dancks’s guidance for helping her secure the role.

Other Syracuse Law alumni have had the privilege of getting to know Dancks through organizations within the legal community.

“Judge Dancks is one of the most generous humans, and she had a truly demanding job yet would still go above and beyond,” says Colleen Gibbons L’17, current president of the Central New York Women’s Bar Association. “She is very thoughtful and genuine in a way that was really helpful to me—explaining her own career path, sharing her experiences, both good and bad; helping develop a strong network of women, and still having a depth of humility that is astonishing.”

Hon. Thérèse Wiley Dancks L’91 with 6 other people, two holding plaques. Standing in front of Judges bench.
Judge Dancks with the winning team from the 2024 Hancock Estabrook 1L Oral Advocacy Competition.

Finding Her Next Chapter and Not Failing at Retirement

Dancks will probably never know quite how many people she has left a positive impression on, as there are too many to count. What she is certain of, however, is that she is “not going to fail at retirement.”

“I want to read by the water without having to drag work along with me,” she says. “I’ll keep my license for a few years, so I can do some pro bono work, possibly in landlord tenant court or small claims arbitration. Maybe at some point I’ll teach a class or a seminar. They know where to find me.”

Dancks also intends to volunteer for local organizations, which will probably include a cat shelter, a hospital, and reading programs in elementary schools, including the Read Across America Program, an initiative that the Central New York Women’s Bar Association has taken on to make sure children learn to love reading.

“It’s going to be a different rhythm, but I want some time to explore and see what I want to do in my next chapter,” Dancks says. “Whatever that is, I’m certain I’ll continue to work for justice in some way to help make the world a little bit better.”

Youth Law Day Welcomes More Than 120 High School Students to Syracuse University College of Law

Syracuse University College of Law’s annual Youth Law Day event recently welcomed more than 120 high school students from across Central New York to Dineen Hall for a wide-ranging introduction to the legal profession. The students also learned about the role of an attorney in society and how to begin their path to law school.

SU College of Law students standing in front of a banner and blue accessLex gift bags

Participating schools were:

Baldwinsville – CW Baker High School

Binghamton High School Mock Trial team

Geneva High School

ITC High School

Marcellus Central School District

Nottingham High School

Public Service Leadership Academy

The welcome address was delivered by Crandall Melvin Professor of Law and Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs Lauryn Gouldin, followed by an introduction to the federal courts and the Justice for All Program by the Hon. Joseph F. Bianco, Circuit Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

Eight Central New York judges standing in a line in Dineen hall

Students heard from a panel of legal professionals who shared their unique journeys to law school, featuring Jimmie McCurdy G’09, L’09; William Wolfe L’20; Marisol Estrada Cruz L’23; Shira Levin G’25, L’25, and Professor Thomas Leith.

Then, students divided into groups to tackle a negotiation strategy session led by College of Law students. Students were able to network with members of the local, state, and federal judiciary during lunch. A question-and-answer panel of current Syracuse Law students followed, with the students sharing their path to law school, best ways to prepare for law school, and more. The panel was moderated by Anthony Ruscito L’27 and featured Kayzjah Charles L’26, Eric Boutros L’27, Elizaveta Bukraba-Ulanova L’27, and Mira Gaitanis L’28.

Four SU College of Law students in front of courtroom participating in an activity while students sit in the audience watching.

Closing remarks were provided by Professor Courtney Abbott Hill L’09, who coordinated this year’s event.

Event sponsors were:

Syracuse University College of Law

AccessLex

Barclay Damon

Bond, Schoeneck & King

Bousquet Holstein

Kaplan Bar Review

Lexis Nexis

Wladis Law Firm

Professor Shubha Ghosh Writes About Antitrust Issues in the Merger of Paramount and Warner Bros. Discovery

Crandall Melvin Professor of Law Shubha Ghosh has contributed the article “Paramount-WBD Deal Would Widen Net For Antitrust Scrutiny” to Law360.

Ghosh writes, ”On Feb. 6, the U.S. Department of Justice announced that it would widen its inquiry into Netflix Inc.’s proposed acquisition of WBD. The Netflix-WBD deal raised concerns for antitrust enforcers. These concerns are exacerbated for the Paramount-WBD combination. There’s no doubt the DOJ will continue its scrutiny of mergers between these two dominant media companies.

What justifies the extended investigation are several uncertain issues raised by this merger. Some of the uncertainty is like what arises in any merger. But other sources of uncertainty are unique to content creation and distribution markets.”

Professor William Banks Speaks with The Guardian on Immigration Arrests on U.S. Military Base

Professor of Law Emeritus William Banks discussed possible Posse Comitatus Act violations during traffic stops on a U.S. Military Base in California with The Guardian. His comments are in the story, “‘We got hooked’: arrests on US army base spark fear of military coordination with ICE.”

The traffic stops and on-base detentions at Fort Hunter Liggett appear to violate the spirit of the Act and represent a “creep in the wrong direction toward military participation in law enforcement”, said Banks.

Banks also said the traffic stops at Fort Hunter Liggett set a dangerous precedent of harnessing military resources for domestic political goals.

Professor Nina Kohn Leads Efforts to Reform Model Rule of Professional Conduct

Distinguished Professor of Law Nina Kohn has helped lead a successful effort to reform the American Bar Association (ABA) Model Rule of Professional Conduct (MRPC) 1.14, which addresses how lawyers work with clients with decision-making limitations.


For more than a decade, Kohn has been working to make the case for reforming MRPC 1.14 through her scholarship and public service work.  More recently, she helped lead a group of ABA leaders and legal experts, including other academics, judges, and practicing attorneys, to consider reforms and draft an improved rule. The reformed rule was adopted by the ABA House of Delegates at the ABA’s recent midyear meeting.


 “The old ethics rule was both confusing to attorneys and provided them with insufficient guidance on how to deal with the thorny ethical issues that frequently come up when representing a client with cognitive capacity challenges,” Kohn explains.  “Worse yet, it inadvertently encouraged some lawyers to make some bad calls when working with clients with cognitive disabilities, while leaving lawyers doing the ‘right thing’ by clients with such disabilities having their conduct questioned—or even threatened with disciplinary action.”


Kohn describes the new rule as “a major step forward for individuals with actual or perceived cognitive disabilities, and others with decision-making limitations, including minors,” said Kohn. “It will also be a terrific boon to lawyers who represent them.”


Kohn predicts that the new ethics rule will be particularly helpful to individuals subject to guardianship or conservatorship.  As Kohn explained in a recent Forbes article, the revised provisions “clearly state that lawyers may ethically represent individuals subject to guardianship or conservatorship who wish to challenge or modify that arrangement”—something that courts have sometimes not appreciated. 

Other key aspects of the reformed rule include:

  • Modernized, less stigmatizing language
  • Removal of language that unintentionally encouraged lawyers to pursue guardianship over clients
  • Clearer direction on when attorneys can discuss confidential information about clients with disabilities
  • Detailed guidance for lawyers working with clients who have surrogate decision-makers
  • Specific guidance for attorneys working with minors
  • Specific guidance for attorneys working with criminal defendants whose capacity is at issue

More detailed information on these topics can be found in this article, co-written by Kohn and Charlie Sabatino, Aging and Law Consultant and Former Director of the ABA Commission on Law and Aging.


Kohn also wrote about the implications of the new ethics rule at Forbes.com.

Syracuse University to Unveil Portrait of President Biden

An oil portrait of alumnus and 46th U.S. President Joseph R. Biden Jr. L’68, H’09 will go on permanent display in the College of Law’s Dineen Hall Law Library after a ceremony in April.

Syracuse University will unveil a portrait of alumnus and 46th U.S. President Joseph R. Biden Jr. L’68, H’09 in Dineen Hall at the College of Law during a private ceremony with the former president on Tuesday, April 14, 2026.

The artwork, painted by distinguished American portrait artist Michael Shane Neal, is an oil-on-canvas portraiture completed in 2025-2026. The portrait was commissioned by Syracuse University to honor one of its most prominent alumni. Neal is one of America’s foremost portrait artists, whose works hang in the U.S. Capitol, the Smithsonian’s National Portrait Gallery and the Pentagon, among other prominent institutions.

“Syracuse Law is proud to count a former president among our many outstanding alumni,” College of Law Dean Terence J. Lau L’98 says. “President Biden has never forgotten where his legal career began, and we have never forgotten him. His portrait in Dineen Hall will remind every student who passes through our doors that a Syracuse Law education doesn’t just open doors. It can change the course of history.”

Biden earned a juris doctor from the College of Law in 1968 and has maintained a close connection with the University ever since. He delivered the College of Law Commencement address on four occasions—in 1994, 2002, 2006, and 2016—and returned to campus in 2009 to deliver the University’s Commencement address and receive an honorary degree.

Biden received the University’s Chancellor’s Medal in 1974; the Law Alumni Association’s Distinguished Service Award in 2003; and the George Arents Pioneer Medal, the University’s highest alumni award, in 2005. In 2018, he was honored with a prestigious Syracuse Law Honors Award from the Syracuse University Law Alumni Association and the College of Law.

The portrait will be on permanent display in the college’s Law Library Reading Room, where the public can view the painting during normal library hours.

OutLaw Hosts Pathways to the Bench Panel

OutLaw recently hosted the panel discussion “Pathways to the Bench; LGBTQ+ Judges on Identity, Advocacy, and the Judiciary.” The panel featured judges from across New York state who shared the stories behind their paths to the bench, the different routes taken to judicial service, and how identity and lived experiences can shape their work on the bench.

Participating judges were:

The Hon. Seth D. Eichenholtz L’02, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of New York 

The Hon. Staci Dennis-Taylor L’14, Syracuse City Court Judge

The Hon. Gary A. Wilson Jr., Buffalo City Court Judge

The Hon. David Fried, New York State Court of Claims Judge

Entertainment and Sports Law Symposium Culminates with Keynote Address from Michael Marino L’74, Partner at Seyfarth Shaw LL.P.

The annual Entertainment and Sports Law symposium brought together alumni, professors, and industry experts to discuss timely legal topics in the entertainment and sports industries in a day-long series of panels.

The keynote speaker was Michael Marino L’ 74, Partner at Seyfarth Shaw LL.P. Marino specializes in labor and union law and litigation. He has unique exposure to and experience in sports marketing and SAG-related matters, having represented celebrity athletes and actors in marketing and entertainment matters. He was joined by his son Mike Marino L’96, who serves as a Partner for the boutique firm Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP after spending much of his career overseeing Labor & Employment for Warner Brothers Studios.

Pictured from left to right Anthony Ruscitto L'27, Hannah Rice L'27, Mike Marino L’96, Michael Marino L’ 74, Matt Cohn L'28, Rebecca Lee L'27, and Beth Kubala In front of fireplace in Dineen Hall.
The Marinos visit with student members of the Betty and Michael D. Wohl Veterans Legal Clinic and Executive Director, Office of Clinical Legal Education, Beth Kubala. Pictured from left to right Anthony Ruscitto L’27, Hannah Rice L’27, Mike Marino L’96, Michael Marino L’ 74, Matt Cohn L’28, Rebecca Lee L’27, and Beth Kubala.  

The panels were:

Inside the General Counsel’s Office

  • Brett Greenfield ’14, L’18, BeatBox
  • Liz Weeks L’13, Wizards of the Coast
  • Aya Hoffman G’18, L’18, Comcast

Legal Issues in Broadcast Media and Content Distribution

  •  Donya Feizbakhsh L’19, Roku
  • Shawna Benfield L’09, Walt Disney Company

Music Law in Practice: Licensing, Distribution, and Digital Media

  • Olivia Barton L’24, Epic Games
  • Bryan Davidson ‘12, L’15, iHeartMedia
  • Adam Weitz L’00, APM Music

Intellectual Property in Entertainment

  • Imani Deas L’21, Sony Music Entertainment
  • Jasmine Geyen L’24, Association of American Publishers

The Business of Representation: Agents, Managers, and Athlete Advocacy

  • Riley Christian L’16, Artifex Athleta, P.C.
  • Dallas Steele L’12, William Morris Endeavor
  • Payton Sorci L’22, LIFT Sports Management

Experts in Name, Image, and Likeness

  • Dan Greene L’16, Newman & Lickstein
  • Professor John Wolohan G’18, David B. Falk College of Sport and College of Law 
  • Professor David Meluni, David B. Falk College of Sport  
  • Julz Dunne, Brand strategist specializing in NIL and athlete marketing 
Pictured from left to right Adrienne Lutz, Michael Marino L’ 74, Dafni Kiritsis , Mike Marino L’96, Lily Hughes.  Standing in front of Syracuse University flag.
The Marinos met with members of Advancement and the Career Services teams during their visit to Syracuse Law. Pictured from left to right Adrienne Lutz, Michael Marino L’ 74, Dafni Kiritsis , Mike Marino L’96, Lily Hughes.  

College of Law Students Contribute Comment on Proposed New Federal Rules of Evidence Rule 707 on Artificial Intelligence

Ten College of Law students, under the direction of Professor Todd Berger, researched and wrote a public comment on a proposed new federal rule of evidence. The Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules proposes amendments to existing evidence rules and the creation of new rules to the Federal Rules of Evidence, which the pubic could submit comments before the Committee makes a recommendation.

The students selected to write on proposed Rule 707 that addresses growing concerns around the use of AI-generated evidence, particularly when such evidence functions similarly to expert testimony and raises parallel questions of reliability, bias, error, and interpretability.

The submission focused on how the proposed Rule 707 was duplicitous of existing rules and on the use of AI models as a substitute for expert testimony. The students tested and debated the use of AI for expert testimony using a variety of AI models before submitting their comment.

“This was a unique legal research and writing exercise crossed with the Federal Rules of Evidence that produced a reasoned, practical comment that would be reviewed by the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Evidence,” said Berger. “The comment brought a different perspective on the proposed rule that the committee had yet to consider. It’s not often that law students could possibly shape a rule of evidence and impact the practice of law in Federal courts and possibly in state courts.”

The Committee will propose any amendments and new rules to the Rule of Evidence before submitting it to the United States Supreme Court for approval and then to Congress for final adoption.

Students took on this challenge for a variety of reasons and learned about how AI could be used in legal proceedings.

“I got involved with this research because in my personal life I do not use or like the use of AI. I wanted to be informed and involved in expressing concern about AI usage and its implications for the legal field. Over the course of our work, I used several AI platforms and saw how they responded, how different platforms think, and the variety of answers and possibilities from it,” said Emily Bielecki L’26. “Though I think it can be useful in closed universes and tailored platforms, like Lexis or Westlaw, I was reassured that AI makes mistakes and should never be substituted for expertise. I think our comment was thorough and provides blatant evidence and examples of why AI cannot be used as an expert witness. I hope it is taken seriously and reviewed by the Committee with the same thoroughness as it was written.”

“My decision to get involved stemmed from my background as a scientist. The proposed rule sits at the intersection of expert evidence and legal standards for reliability, and I wanted to contribute to the conversation that could shape how courts evaluate these new tools, especially as they become more common not just in scientific research but common life,” said Jimmie Bullock L’28. “During this court, what stood out to me most was how much precision matters, because small wording choices can have major consequences in litigation. Our comment focused heavily on generative AI platform, and it seemed that while the Committee’s intentions were genuine in addressing a larger problem, the proposal may have opened a door to a significant unintended consequence. I think our comment offered not only a real-world simulation of how the rule premature, but also careful analysis of those vulnerabilities. I hope the Committee sees our submission not just as a student project, but as a serious contribution from future litigators who are invested in protecting the integrity of the trial process.”