When Yu-Shiuan “Carr” Lin L’25 LL.M. decided to pursue a Master of Laws (LL.M.) in the United States, his thoughts weren’t only on the court of law but also on the basketball court. Since middle school, Lin has been a big fan of “the famous Carmelo Anthony,” who played for Syracuse University’s Men’s Basketball in 2002-03, leading the team to its first NCAA Championship.
Currently pursuing a Bachelor of Laws (LL.B.) at National Chengchi University College of Law in Taipei, Taiwan, Lin discovered that his home school had a partnership with Syracuse University College of Law that would allow him to pursue an LL.M. as part of his studies. “Not only can I go to the school where Carmelo Anthony played, but Syracuse Law’s LL.M. program will help me get my master’s degree as soon as possible.”
Lin’s interest is in environmental law, and he comes to Syracuse Law with a number of internships where he conducted research on urban planning, food security and environmental impact assessment. Recently, he had the opportunity to attend The Asian American Bar Association of New York’s: Navigating OCI with Corporate Attorneys in New York City, where he was able to network with partners from several 20 top law firms of Vault Law 100. There, he met a partner who had worked on various projects surrounding financing energy and infrastructure development in Asia, and they discussed how there are not enough attorneys practicing in areas like energy or the environment in that part of the world. This experience encouraged Lin’s interest in eventually returning to his home to help contribute to environmental law efforts. Although, since joining the LL.M. program, he says he can also see himself rolling his environmental law knowledge into international law, as well.
He is enjoying the LL.M. program in Syracuse and has met others from countries all over the world with different levels of professional experience. “It’s amazing to discuss the U.S. legal system with other students who are already practicing at big law firms and are high level professionals with a lot of experience in their own countries, while I am still earning my law degree,” he says. “So far, it’s just what I imagined it would be here, though, and I find the workload very accommodating and more collaborative. Of course, the curriculum is pretty intense, but I like that I have some space to explore other interests.”
Some of those interests include participation in the General Counsel Symposium held at Syracuse Law in September; the 2024 Fall Conference of the Asian American Bar Association of New York, which he attended as part of the Law School’s Asian-Pacific American Law Student Association; and the 2024 International Law Association Weekend organized by the American branch of the International Law Association (ABILA) that he attended in New York City with the Syracuse Law’s International Law Society.
After Lin completes his LL.M. next year, he will return to Taiwan for mandatory military service. After he completes that requirement, he plans to come back to the U.S. to take the New York State Bar Exam.
“Taking the bar in New York State has many advantages for me, as it is the biggest bar association in the United States,” he explains. “Passing the New York State Bar will give me eligibility to handle foreign affairs and legal issues related to imports/exports and the manufacturing industry, which we are so famous for in Taiwan. Businesses there have to deal with U.S. law all the time.”
As he eagerly awaits the opportunity to see his first basketball game in the Syracuse University JMA Wireless Dome in the coming months, he intends to continue to learn as much as he can about U.S. culture and also its perspective on the law. Lin is making the most of his time at Syracuse Law and says he knows that completing the LL.M. program is sure to give him “a home court advantage” in his legal career.
“Symbolically, it puts the military right in the center of immigration enforcement,” said Banks, who has studied and written about the use of the military in the U.S. interior.
“When (the military) has been deployed in recent years, including in the Bush and Obama (administration) … they’ve been undertaking activities that we would not call law enforcement. The worry, historically, about putting soldiers in the position of cops is that they’re not trained to do that. Their orientation is entirely different — they’re trained as warfighters, not as law enforcers,” he said.
On Oct. 31, 1980, a baby boy was born in Santiago, Chile, to a poor, young, Indigenous mother. He was whisked away before she was allowed to hold him, and later she was told that the baby had died. But, he was very much alive, taken away by a ring of traffickers who created fraudulent documents and sold him into international adoption. It would be decades before Jimmy L. Thyden González L’21, would discover the circumstances surrounding his birth and use his knowledge of the law to fight for the rights of thousands of other counterfeit adoptees around the world.
Amazingly, Thyden González’s story is not unique. Tens of thousands of babies had been victims of a scheme under Chile’s then dictator Augusto Pinochet, who believed that kidnapping the children of poor, Indigenous and often single women was a way to reduce the country’s poverty rate and improve economic conditions. His twisted rationale meant that the Chilean government would not have to support as many poor families, and, in turn, it would create an economic boom through fees paid by unwitting adoptive parents throughout Europe and North America. Corrupt doctors, judges, government officials and clergy were an integral part of running this horrific system of child trafficking, which, according to the Chilean government, took approximately 20,000 children away from their parents between the 1950s and 1990s. However, it is estimated by civil and nonprofit groups working to address the harms that the actual number is closer to 50,000.
Thyden González was adopted from a Chilean orphanage at age 2 by an American couple who had no idea that the child’s papers and backstory were fraudulent. They believed his birth mother had willingly given him up, being too young and poor to care for her baby. His paperwork called him “Carlos,” but the couple named him James “Jimmy” Thyden, and he had a happy childhood growing up in Virginia.
After high school, Thyden González joined the U.S. Marine Corps, where he served for 19 years. In 2011, just before he was preparing to be deployed to Afghanistan, his adoptive mother gave him his adoption records. As Thyden González looked through them, he began to notice discrepancies. One, for example, said he had been born in a hospital in Chile to a “known mother.” Another said he had “no living family.” Papers also indicated that his mother’s name was Maria González, which, unfortunately, was a very common name in that country. At the time, he had no idea what the real story was, but he put those thoughts in the back of his mind as he headed off to Afghanistan.
Upon his return, he often thought about investigating his adoption story, but he wasn’t quite sure how to begin. Many in his adopted family told him he was loved and that he should be grateful for the life he had been given, but he continued to feel a question that needed answering. Thyden González thought about traveling to Chile to research his background, but that required permission from the military and finances In addition, he spoke no Spanish and knew little of the culture.
Thyden González separated from the Marines in 2018 and earned an undergraduate degree from Liberty University, and then used the G.I. Bill and Syracuse’s commitment to the Yellow Ribbon Program to earn a law degree from the Syracuse University College of Law with the intention of being a criminal defense lawyer fighting the disparities toward people of color within the criminal justice system.
Making Connections to Find his Chilean Family Link
In 2023, his wife came across an article about a man who had been the victim of illegal adoption in Chile. The story felt very familiar to Thyden González, and he decided the time had come to find out more about the circumstances surrounding his birth and adoption. Notably within the article was mention of a nonprofit organization in Chile, Nos Buscamos, working to reunite families. An organization which he describes as “two ladies working with their laptops to change the world.”
Thyden González got in contact with them, eventually sending copies of his paperwork— and quickly learning that the attorney and social worker who had handled his adoption were some of the most notorious traffickers in Chile. He was advised to submit his DNA to MyHeritage, which had been supplying DNA kits to women in Chile in the hopes of finding some of the trafficked children. As a lawyer, he was hesitant at first, but, knowing there was the possibility of reuniting with his family, he finally decided to do so. Just 42 days later, the DNA results connected him with a woman from Chile identified as his mother’s cousin. He emailed the woman, who was herself skeptical but did tell him that there was a Maria González in her family and that she was alive.
Soon, he received a message from his aunt saying, “We found her, and she wants to meet you.” It was only after that that Thyden González first heard the true story of what had happened to him and his mamá on the day he was born, and how, since that day, she believed her son had died. Soon, he was frequently texting with his mamá in his “terrible Spanish,” as he raised the money to travel to Chile.
At the same time, González got in contact with other Chilean’s who had been illegally adopted, one of whom, Adrian Reamey, was making a documentary about the issue and wanted his legal expertise. She asked him to accompany her to Chile as part of the documentary-making process. Finally, he had the opportunity to reunite with his mamá and meet his family!
The reunion was tearful and overwhelming, as he hugged his mamá for the first time, surrounded by other relatives who welcomed him joyously. Thyden González, his wife and children, were able to spend a week getting to know his mamá. Soon after, he officially added “González” to his name, making him Jimmy L. Thyden González in honor of his Chilean heritage.
Gonzalez hugs his birth mother for the first time during his visit to Chile.
In the two weeks that followed, González stayed in Chile with the documentary film crew, meeting with government officials, where he learned that the Policia De Investigaciones De Chile (PDI), the civilian police department, had only five individuals in the entire country investigating illegal adoptions. No one was truly working to provide any kind of closure or reparations for the thousands of mamás and their stolen babies.
González returned to the U.S., put his law practice on hold and decided the best way he could help would be to get an LL.M. in international human rights, which he completed last year at American University’s Washington College of Law.
Gonzalez meeting his Chilean relatives for the first time in his visit to Chile.
Creating a Nonprofit to Help Others Affected by Illegal Trafficking Link
At the same time, he created a nonprofit organization, Grafting Hope, to help those impacted by illegal human trafficking obtain reparations. The organization has already brought a great deal of awareness to these counterfeit adoptions, which, unfortunately, still continue at some level even today. Thyden González has met with officials in Chile and the U.S., making connections through both embassies. He also had the opportunity to brief the United Nations Committee on Enforced Disappearances, testifying on the atrocities of these illegal adoptions.
When he heard that the president of Chile, Gabriel Boric Font, planned a visit to the U.S., Thyden González started a grassroots effort through a group chat with other impacted adoptees asking them to come to Washington, D.C. Thyden González collected many of their stories with Nos Buscamos and Reamey and presented them to Boric, telling him, “These are our stories, and we need your help. We, too, are Chilean.”
Thyden González has since been working non-stop to make those impacted families whole again. In addition to Grafting Hope, he is collaborating with Chilean law firm Colombara Estategia Legal. Together he sued the Chilean government, fighting for reparations on the basis that it failed to protect these babies and their mothers, thereby violating their human rights. He has filed suit asking the Chilean government to acknowledge the harm caused and establish a commission to identify all victims, both mamás and children, as well as recognize the identity and citizenship of those stolen babies and their descendants. Thyden González himself cannot claim Chilean citizenship under his chosen identity since the name on his adoption papers was fraudulent. He also walks a fine line because unwinding his adoption might nullify his American citizenship with the chance that this retired, disabled U.S. Marine could be deported. But, if he can’t clarify his adoption and be cleared as an American citizen, it will be nearly impossible for him to bring his mamá and family to the U.S. to care for them.
Jimmy Thyden González stands at the Supreme Court after presenting a criminal complaint in Santiago, Chile, on July 1, 2024. Photograph: Esteban Félix/AP
Still, every day, he continues the fight, and his improved Spanish language skills have made it easier to keep in touch with his mamá. Thyden González recently published an op-ed in The New York Times telling his story and has been using various media outlets to continue to raise awareness of counterfeit adoption. Last November, he also shared his experience with students at Syracuse Law.
“It is not lost on me that I came to Syracuse Law to study criminal defense and was, in fact, the victim of a crime from the day I was born,” he says. “I intend to continue to advocate and fight, not only for myself and my mamá, but for every mamá out there who lost a child to this horrendous counterfeit adoption scheme. It has become my passion, and the center of my identity and my career. I don’t intend to stop until there is a resolution, but I also know it’s going to take time. Still, I hope to see that day come soon.”
Syracuse University College of Law is pleased to announce the 2025 Kurt Wimmer IAPP Westin Scholar Award honoree as 3L Courtney Ryan. With the growing need for well-qualified privacy and data protection professionals, the annual Westin Scholar Awards were created by the International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP) to support students who are identified as future leaders in the field of privacy and data protection.
As a participating Westin Scholar Award school, the College of Law’s 2025 Kurt Wimmer L’85 IAPP Westin Scholar Award Committee (Amber Lawyer L’17, Deputy Chair, Bond, Schoeneck & King Data Privacy and Cybersecurity Practice, Professor Lauryn Gouldin, Professor Shubha Ghosh, Professor Keli Perrin L’05, Professor Daniel Traficonte, and Assistant Dean Lily Yan Hughes) selected Ryan to receive this year’s award in recognition of her passion and path that she has already forged for herself in privacy law.
Ryan was a summer law clerk at Bond, Schoeneck, & King and a legal extern with Trillium Health, where she gained hands-on experience navigating complex privacy regulations, including HIPAA and FERPA. Through these roles, she developed a better understanding of the challenges businesses and organizations face in maintaining compliance while also leveraging data to innovate and grow.
“I found immense satisfaction in helping clients address these challenges, ensuring their data protection practices align with evolving legal standards. These experiences solidified my passion for privacy law and reaffirmed my desire to pursue a career in this field,” said Ryan. “I would like to thank the Kurt Wimmer IAPP Westin Award Committee. It is an honor to be selected, and I look forward to obtaining the IAPP certifications and contributing to the field of privacy.”
Ryan will be awarded the following:
• A $1,000 cash award
• 2 years of membership with the IAPP
• 3 complimentary exams for IAPP certifications (CIPP, CIPM, CIPT)
• Unlimited access to online training for recipient’s selected IAPP certification exams
“The industry of privacy is fast-growing and constantly evolving. We’ve created this award as a way to put the privacy profession at the forefront of students’ minds as they explore potential career opportunities,” said J. Trevor Hughes, IAPP President and CEO. “Congratulations, Courtney. We look forward to seeing the good work you will bring to the field of privacy”.
About the Westin Scholar Award and Kurt Wimmer
The Westin Scholar Awards pay homage to the late Dr. Alan Westin, a foundational voice in the field of privacy and data protection. Throughout his life, Dr. Westin researched and wrote about privacy, data protection, digital identity and the future of how societies will deal with issues at the intersection of law and technology. He is the namesake for the IAPP Westin Research Center and Fellowship Program, which was founded in 2013 and serves as a pathway for future leaders in the community. More information on the Award can be found at Westin Scholar Award.
Proud Syracuse Law alumnus Kurt Wimmer L’85 was an international leader in privacy, cybersecurity, technology, and media law, whose career at Covington & Burling spanned more than three decades, including as co-chair of the firm’s global data privacy and cybersecurity practice in Washington, D.C.
As a privacy and technology lawyer, Wimmer worked closely with clients including Facebook, Microsoft, Samsung and other multinational organizations, in addition to non-traditional clients such as the National Football League and National Hockey League.
Thus far, Nassau hasn’t experienced sudden changes or pauses in the audits he defends against. “I haven’t seen any of that,” he said. “I wouldn’t mind seeing a little of that.”
When a tax return doesn’t match the information the IRS has, the agency sends an automated underreporting notice. “Those sort of automated underreporting audits, I can’t see them stopping,” Nassau said. “The computers are just going to spit those out” unless programmed to stop.
Dean Terence Lau L’98 has written the opinion article “Collaboration Is Crucial to Navigating the New Tariff Landscape” for Bloomberg Law.
The article gives corporate counsel advice on approaching tariffs amidst uncertainty by breaking down corporate silos and enhancing collaboration, emphasizing patience, and underlining the need to be understanding and supportive of global teams that are facing unique local challenges.
In summary, Lau states, “The new tariff landscape demands that legal departments serve as both strategic partners and guides through uncertainty. By fostering genuine cross-functional collaboration, counseling patience without paralysis, and addressing the very real human impacts, in-house counsel can help their organizations navigate these choppy waters.”
Professor Gregory Germain spoke with Newsweek for the story “Could Donald Trump Deport Americans?” The article examines the legal issues surrounding how the Trump administration could strip American citizens of their citizenship and deport them to prisons in El Salvador.
Germain said that the U.S can deport naturalized, foreign-born U.S. citizens. “Under existing law, the government can revoke the naturalization of citizens if they made misrepresentations or omissions during their naturalization process. There is a presumption that members of a communist party or a terrorist organization during the 5 years after naturalization misrepresented or omitted information.”
“Once their naturalization is revoked, they can be deported.”
He said there would first have to be court hearings. Germain said that revoking the citizenship of someone born in the U.S. is a far more difficult process. “Revoking citizenship of natural-born citizens, as opposed to naturalized citizens, is more uncertain,” he said.
“Trump’s new executive order denying citizenship to children born here of illegal aliens only applies prospectively [in the future] so far.”
“It is conceivable that he or Congress could attempt to make it retroactive to people born here before the new executive order, although it is far from clear what the courts would ultimately say about that,” he said.
Associate Dean of Faculty Research and Professor of Law Kristen Barnes recently delivered the keynote address at Cornell University’s Town and Gown Conference on housing. Barnes’s address was titled “Housing and the Future: Challenges and Opportunities.” Barnes is also a Visiting Professor, City and Regional Planning at Cornell University.
The team of Shahzaib Hafeez L’26 and Elyse Maniccia L’26 prevailed over Garrison Funk L’25 and Daniel Morgan L’25 in the final round of the Mackenzie Hughes LLP Edmund H. Lewis Appellate Advocacy Competition. Hafeez and Maniccia won the Best Brief and Morgan was selected as the Best Oral Advocate.
Final round judges were Gabrielle Bull L’19 (Associate Attorney at Martin, Ganotis, Brown, Mould & Currie PC), Gavin Gretsky L’24 (Associate at Bond, Schoeneck, and King PLLC), Professor Suzette Meléndez, and Tom Taylor ’79, L’87 (Of Counsel, Bousquet Holstein PLLC.)
Sponsored by Syracuse law firm Mackenzie Hughes LLP, this competition is open to two-person teams consisting of second and third-year Syracuse Law students. The competition is named for the Hon. Edmund H. Lewis L’1909, a distinguished alumnus of Syracuse University College of Law, a partner at Mackenzie Hughes, and a Chief Judge of the New York Court of Appeals. Each year, volunteer judges evaluate the teams’ written appellate briefs as well as oral argument performance through multiple rounds.
The College of Law would like to thank all the judges and evaluators.
From left, Professor Suzette Melendez, Tom Taylor, Elyse Maniccia, Shahzaib Hafeez, Gavin Gretsky, and Gabrielle Bull
Professor of Law Gregory Germain spoke with The Guardian for an article on the Department of Justice seeking the death penalty in the Luigi Mangione trial.
Germain said the death penalty raises the stakes and adds “pressure” on Mangione to accept a life sentence if such a plea deal were offered.
German noted, however, that almost all the recent death penalty cases unfolded under Trump’s first term and surmised that his justice department would not agree to a deal for life imprisonment.
“He has political reasons, wanting to seem ‘tough on crime’ by supporting the death penalty,” Germain said.
