News

“The U.S. would lose the 21st Century” – Professor Jamie Baker Discusses Greenland and NATO

The Hon. Jamie Baker, Professor and Director of the Syracuse University Institute for Security Policy and Law, was interviewed on NPR’s On Point podcast about President Trump’s statements on Greenland and the possible impact on NATO. Baker’s interview begins at 21:39 of the podcast.

In response to the question, what would the US lose if there were no NATO, Baker replied, “The U.S. would lose the 21st Century. It would lose the cooperation, the assistance, bases, and intelligence support throughout the NATO countries and bases in Norway and intelligence capacity in Norway that helps secure the arctic and secure the sea routes in the arctic. You would risk the Article 5 border in the Baltics. America thought it could avoid European entanglements and war in Europe before. How did that work out with the First World War and the Second World War? We risk greater war if we pull out of NATO.”

College of Law’s LondonEx Externship Program Featured in National Jurist

The College of Law’s long-running LondonEx externship program was featured in the National Jurist article “Summer programs at home and abroad add perspective, build practical skills.”

LondonEx is a summer externship program in London, U.K., hosted by Syracuse Law. During a seven-week international summer experience, students gain exposure to clients, partner with professionals for personalized mentoring, and enjoy boundless cultural opportunities – in one of the world’s most dynamic cities. LondonEx is open to any full-time or part-time student from an ABA-approved law school who is in good standing.

In the article, Andrew Horsfall ’05, L’10, LondonEx Program Specialist, said a willingness to situate oneself in a novel area of legal practice in a foreign locale shows future employers a certain level of resilience.

Horsfall said one of the things that comes out in the first two or three weeks is just how pleasantly surprised the students are at the level of accessibility that they have to their mentors and just how good their mentors are.  

“I think the students are in awe watching their mentors work, whether it’s arguing in court or presiding from the bench. They come to respect the level of preparation required and the level of detail necessary to do this work and do it well,” he said. “It leaves a meaningful impression on the students because they’re working with people who are operating at a very high level in their respective practices.” 

The application for LondonEx is open through February 1.

A red double decker bus on a street with British flags hung between the buildings

Professor Nina Kohn Discusses the Recent Decision Declaring New York State’s Law Requiring City Judges to Retire at 70 Unconstitutional

Distinguished Professor of Law Nina Kohn provided Syracuse.com with perspectives on the recent New York State Supreme Court decision that the state law requiring city judges outside of New York City to retire at age 70 was unconstitutional.

Kohn said the Equal Rights Amendment, approved in 2024, could lead to a variety of legal actions.

“This case is the tip of the iceberg,” she said. “The new protections for age really call into question many of our laws and policies.”

Kohn pointed out other retirement ages or age-based ticket pricing as other laws that could be impacted by the Equal Rights Amendment.

Kohn agreed that there is no clear reason why age 70 should be the cutoff. For instance, the age cutoff in Pennsylvania is 75.

Professor William C. Banks Discusses the Constitutionality of Annexing Greenland

Professor Emeritus William C. Banks recently spoke with Newsweek about the Constitutionality of annexing Greenland.

Legally, the U.S. cannot forcefully acquire another territory, said Banks. “They couldn’t make a move like this without the approval of the Danes, as well as the Greenlanders.”

Trump himself could not annex Greenland without Congressional approval — an executive order, for example, would not have any legal authority, Banks told Newsweek. But Congress could vote to approve the annexation of Greenland, overriding international law, Banks said, although it would “be abhorrent to most Americans.” This is because the U.S. Constitution doesn’t set out any boundaries on acquiring territories.

Professor Katherine Macfarlane Quoted in Article on Legal Advancements Made in Disability-Based Telework Accommodations

Professor of Law and Director of the Disability Law and Policy Program Katherine Macfarlane provided Bloomberg Law with perspectives on recent court decisions on disability-based teleworking accommodations.

“Remote work is what I’m hearing about” most often, Macfarlane said. Yet some employers remain staunch in their resistance to telework as an accommodation, thinking disabled workers are getting something they don’t deserve, she said.

The disability bias cases this year show judges are taking telework more seriously and seeing physical presence isn’t required for all jobs, the professor said.

First AI Residency Program Makes Impact With New Skills, Ethics, and Urgency to Keep Pace with Booming Technology

How are law firms currently applying AI in the workplace to maximize client services? What are the ethical implications of using AI in the legal field? How will AI impact the current role of lawyers, and what new jobs may emerge? Should AI be regulated, and, if so, how?

These were just some of the questions addressed during AI and the Virtue of Law, a one-week in-person residency held at Syracuse University College of Law in August designed for students in the JDinteractive (JDi) program, with participation also open to on-campus students. This deep-dive into AI was created and facilitated by Professor of Law Jack Graves, and students were eager to attend.

“I think AI will significantly transform law school education and the practice of law,” says Graves, noting that he sees AI as a means of more effective information sharing but also recognizes that many are “terrified” thinking that this technology could replace them. “We have to think about being nimble now because the essential human role today will likely be an AI role in just a few years, and we don’t want to be left behind. Through this residency, I wanted to help demystify generative AI because, used properly, it can be an extraordinary tool.”

Students in classroom with laptops facing projection screen with professor Graves teaching.

Graves, who has taught in the JDi program for the past five years, has a unique blend of expertise in design, development and delivery of accessible and legal education in an online learning environment and 21st century technology-leveraged law practice. A graduate of the University of Colorado Law School, Graves taught technology-leveraged delivery of legal services at the Touri Law Center for 14 years, and prior to that worked in private practice with Chrisman, Bynum & Johnson PC in Colorado and as a judicial law clerk for the U.S. Court of Appeals.

First Time AI Residency Was Popular Draw for JDi Students

Logan Gorg L’26 is a JDi student living in Pennsylvania, who made the trip to the Syracuse University campus to attend the AI residency. She has worked as a paralegal at the law firm of Ross & Ross LLC for the past 10 years and is looking to focus on real estate and probate law upon graduation.

“I learned so much about what AI is, and the information at the residency helped to dispel some of the fears and focus more on where the profession is going,” Gorg says. “Sitting in a room with a group with diverse backgrounds and experiences talking about whether AI was doom or salvation was so interesting. I think the residency showed us that AI is unavoidable, but, if we get out in front of it, we can reap some of the benefits in the legal profession.”

Graves had been contemplating developing a semester-long course in AI for the JDi program, but ultimately he decided that the lightning speed of the technology would be better suited for a short-form, concentrated residency where students with different levels of familiarity could join together to think about being nimble and adapting to technology that is already changing the way the legal field operates.

Students sitting in classroom with laptops

AI Voice-Driven Technology Used to Teach, Demonstrate Abilities 

Coincidentally, the residency took place just as ChatGPT launched Advanced Voice Mode, a significant upgrade that allows for natural, real time conversations using AI. Graves used “Max,” as he named the voice-driven AI technology, to help co-teach the residency and answer students’ questions directly.

“We would have a discussion, and I would say, ‘Max, what do you think?’, explains Graves. “At first students were uncomfortable with it, but once Max started responding and asking them questions using the Socratic method, they started to see how fascinating a learning AI tool could be.”

Students in classroom with professor Graves teaching.

Approach to AI in the Law Resonated Well with JDi Students

Jenny Cameron L’27, who co-owns VIP Marinas with her husband in Florida, decided to enroll in law school to bring a legal perspective to her family business. She, too, attended the AI residency and walked away amazed.

“Honestly, it was one of those residencies that was life changing,” she says. “Before I attended, I was on the fringes of AI, barely using ChatGPT, but since then I’ve been using AI extensively in some form. Part of law school is practicing and knowing how to use AI better and faster, and what I learned at the residency was eye opening. I commend Syracuse Law and Professor Graves for taking the lead on this and helping guide us on how we should be approaching this technology.”

Another participant was Bryan Beene ‘26 a high school government teacher from Texas, who is pursuing law school to prepare for a second career once he retires. He hopes to work as a lawyer in the education or church law space.

“I registered for this AI residency for two reasons: one because Professor Graves was teaching it, and he is one of the best professors I’ve ever had, and two, I had never used AI except for Google searches, and I knew a lack of knowledge around this technology would be a detriment in representing a client,” Beene explains. He noted that he enjoyed learning more about the use of the available tools, as well as discussing the legal and ethical issues, and how regulations and the law are often not keeping up with this fast moving technology.

The newly introduced AI and the Virtue of Law residency received “incredible feedback” from students, according to Graves, who believes this is a topic that should be revisited once a year.

Graves says, “This is not a static course, as the technology is changing continuously, but I think the approach resonated well with the students, not only by teaching them skills but by allaying some of their fears while also emphasizing to them that AI technology in the legal field is advancing fast and furiously. So they need to prepare now.”

Alumna Credits Syracuse Law for Empowering Her to Advocate for Disability Rights in Higher Education

Mary J. Goodwin-Oquendo L’09 learned what true advocacy looks like long before she ever stepped into a law school classroom. Growing up, she watched her mother tirelessly fight to secure appropriate educational services for her younger brother, who has autism and learning disabilities. Seeing firsthand how complex systems can fail families, she began to ask a powerful question: Who helps students who do not have anyone able to challenge the system for them?

Today, Goodwin-Oquendo is that advocate. As the founder of The Goodwin-Oquendo Law Firm in New York City, she champions disability civil rights, particularly related to education, standardized testing, professional licensing, and employment. Getting to this point took grit, talent, and determination. She credits Syracuse University College of Law for providing the foundation, flexibility, and mentorship she needed to earn her law degree and pursue the work that drives her— advocating for others through the legal system.

Goodwin-Oquendo will speak about her experiences and the process of advocating for bar exam accommodations in the spring of 2026 at a webinar hosted by the Disability Law and Policy Program (DLPP). The presentation was purposefully planned as a virtual event, as it accommodates Goodwin-Oquendo’s disability-related needs, as well as those of attendees with disabilities, and allows both on-campus and online JDinteractive students, in addition to other guests around the country, to participate.

Headshot of Mary Goodwin-Oquendo

Walking in the Steps of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg

Goodwin-Oquendo’s desire to be a lawyer started early. She studied at the James Madison High School Law Institute in Brooklyn, New York—the same school the late United States Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg attended. The four-year program helps students understand the legal system through law classes, moot court, and mock trials. She came to see attorneys as “helpers,” and realized  the law could be her pathway to advocate for those who needed a voice.

Facing Her Challenges and Finding a Mentor

While pursuing her undergraduate degree at St. Joseph’s University in New York, Goodwin-Oquendo was diagnosed with fibromyalgia and learned first-hand how difficult it was to navigate higher education with “an invisible, poorly understood disability.”

However, she learned how to self-accommodate her disabilities, graduated as valedictorian, and set her sights on law school. She ultimately chose Syracuse Law because of its various clinics, particularly The Family Law Clinic, because she knew the challenges from clients who felt vulnerable or unheard would make her a more respectful and transparent lawyer.

Her first year wasn’t easy, as Goodwin-Oquendo navigated the demands as a 1L while managing a physical condition that fluctuated day to day. This was compounded by her lack of health insurance (prior to the Affordable Care Act), which limited her ability to receive the care she needed.

“I went from graduating first in my class in college to struggling in my first semester of law school because I didn’t have the physical stamina to keep up the pace,” she explains. “Some of the strategies that had worked in high school and college just didn’t work anymore because the expectations of law school were much higher.”

Fortunately, she enrolled in a class led by Professor of Law Arlene Kanter, who took emeritus status in 2024, Kanter is an acclaimed expert in international and comparative disability law and helped Goodwin-Oquendo understand the accommodations she was entitled to. (Kanter founded the DLPP at Syracuse Law in 2005, one of the nation’s most extensive disability law programs in the U.S.) She is forever grateful to Kanter, who remains a role model, for helping her find ways to manage her disability and continue to succeed. For the past five years, Goodwin-Oquendo has been an adjunct professor at Fordham University School of Law, in part, she says, “to be for my students what Professor Kanter was for me.”

“Professor Kanter had many resources, including this ‘holy book’ of disability law firms in the New York area, which were few and far between,” explains Goodwin-Oquendo. “She encouraged me during my 2L year to reach out to Jo Anne Simon, a disability civil rights attorney in Brooklyn, who later became a state assembly member, to learn more about working in this part of the legal field.”  

They connected, and soon Simon offered Goodwin-Oquendo a summer job at the firm. In 2008, the Americans with Disabilities Amendments Act was passed, reaffirming Congress’s commitment to disability rights. That law  shaped a lot of the work Goodwin-Oquendo did at the firm.

“It was not light work,” she says, “but the job training I received was nothing short of phenomenal—so much so that I joined her firm after law school and stayed there for the next 14 years. Jo Anne remains a dear friend and mentor, and she has done so much to advance the rights of individuals with disabilities.”

Establishing Her Own Firm for Educational Advocacy

In 2024, she launched the Goodwin-Oquendo Law Firm in New York City, dedicated to representing individuals with cognitive, physical, and psychiatric disabilities who face discrimination or need accommodations in education for admissions tests, professional licensing exams, state bar exams, and medical boards.

“People come to me because they clearly need certain accommodations to fully access and complete an exam, for example, and they are being denied this for the highest stakes exam of their lives,” she explains, noting there is still a level of ignorance around the use of technology on examinations.

“Others come to me because they’ve received a diagnosis later in life or have been living with a disability that wasn’t as challenging for them until they reached college, law school, or medical school, and now they need someone to help them understand their options and advocate for their rights.”

Goodwin-Oquendo operates her firm virtually, which not only accommodates her disabilities but also allows her to assist clients around the country. “Business is booming, which sounds great, but it is actually a little sad because that means there is still a lot of discrimination for those with disabilities,” she says.

She recently hired Syracuse Law alumna Ptahra Jeppe L’19 as counsel to the firm. Jeppe started as a client and mentee but was so impressive that Goodwin-Oquendo asked her to join in 2025. Jeppe has dyslexia and practiced special education law for several years, which has added another area of mastery to the practice.

Goodwin-Oquendo’s advocacy continues at Syracuse University, where she now serves on the Center on Disability and Inclusion’s Advisory Committee. She’s also involved in the broader legal community as a member of the Disability Rights Bar Association and the New York State Bar Association, serving on its Committee on Disability Rights, where she enjoys creating Continuing Legal Education (CLE) courses for attorneys and serves as one of the editors of its disability treatise.

She finds value in serving others. “I want to keep pushing myself, and what keeps me going are the former clients who reach out and say, for example, they passed the bar, or they are now a licensed physician or educator,” Goodwin-Oquendo explains.

“Their unique experiences will enrich these fields. I am grateful for the education, advocacy, and overall encouragement from Syracuse Law that helped me get to where I am today. And it will be a full circle moment to share my experiences with students at the College of Law this spring.”

Syracuse University College of Law AALS 2026 Annual Meeting Participants

Several College of Law deans and professors will be panelists, moderators, and discussants at the 2026 American Association of Law Schools Annual Meeting, Jan. 6 – 9 in New Orleans, LA.

Associate Dean of Students Kelly Curtis is the recipient of the Section on Academic Support Impact Award.


January 6

Professor of Law and Director, Disability Law and Policy Program Katherine Macfarlane

Section: Law Professors with Disabilities and Allies, Sponsored by Disability Law and Law and Mental Disability

Event: Managing Disability: From Academic Job Searching Through Tenure, Promotion, and Beyond

Event Role: Moderator

1:00 PM – 2:15 PM

Room: Grand Salon Section 3

This panel pairs section members who are new to the academy or to the section with experienced discussants who provide constructive feedback in an informal, supportive setting.

Professor of Law and Director, Disability Law and Policy Program Katherine Macfarlane

Section: Law Professors with Disabilities and Allies, Sponsored by Disability Law and Law and Mental Disability

Event: Section Works-in-Progress

Event Role: Moderator

2:35 PM – 3:50 PM

Room: Grand Salon Section 3

This discussion-style panel, titled “Managing Disability: From Academic Job Searching Through Tenure, Promotion, and Beyond,” brings together junior, mid-level, and senior law faculty to examine the unique challenges and opportunities individuals with disabilities face at all stages of their academic careers. Panelists will discuss topics such as navigating the academic job market; requesting and securing accommodations during the search, interview, and onboarding processes; and managing disability during the pre-tenured, application for promotion, and post-tenured time periods. Panelists will share their insights relating to building scholarly, teaching, and service networks; managing time and energy; and advocating for necessary support systems to ensure equal opportunity. The continued need for academic institutions to move beyond minimal ADA compliance—towards truly inclusive and equitable spaces for all faculty—will be a theme throughout.

Professor Mary Szto

Section: AALS Hot Topic Program

Event: Beyond NextGen

Event Role: Speaker

2:35 PM – 3:50 PM

Room: Canal

The bar exam is changing. Whether through the NCBE’s launch of the NextGen exam or the double-digit number of states considering the adoption of non-bar exam pathways to licensure, the world of attorney licensure is experiencing a significant reform period. This discussion brings together licensure experts from all corners of the country for a critical discussion about the need and effectiveness of that reform.

Professor of Law and Director, Disability Law and Policy Program Katherine Macfarlane

Section: Law, Medicine and Health Care

Event: Section Works-in-Progress

Event Role: Commentator

4:10 PM – 5:25 PM

Room: Grand Salon Section 16

Emerging Issues in Law, Medicine, and Health Care. In this panel, junior scholars, selected through a blind review process, will present works-in-progress and receive feedback from senior scholars and from the audience.

January 7

Professor of Law and Director, Disability Law and Policy Program Katherine Macfarlane

Section: Disability Law, Sponsored by Civil Rights and Education Law

Event: Section Program

Event Role: Speaker from a Call for Papers

2:35 PM – 3:50 PM

Room: Grand Salon Section 4

The many present attacks on the enforcement of civil and disability rights laws provide us with an opportunity to reflect on the history and impact of these statutes and to consider challenges and possibilities ahead. This panel will consider, among other questions, how the present dismantling of civil rights laws and agencies will impact the enforcement of statutes like the IDEA, Section 504, and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the lives of the people those laws and agencies were created to protect.

January 8

Professor Mary Szto

Section: East Asian Law and Society, Sponsored by Comparative Law, Global Engagement, International Law, and Post Graduate Legal Education

Event: Section Pedagogy Programs

Event Role: Moderator

8:00 AM – 9:15 AM

Room: Grand Salon Section 4

Legal education in the United States is being hit with geopolitical challenges on many fronts: military conflicts around the globe, trade and tariffs disruption, domestic immigration restrictions and removals, an AI arms race, and rising authoritarianism, among others. U.S.-China relations and the broader East Asian region are a key part of these dynamics. This panel will explore how we are seeing these external challenges play out within our institutions and what we in legal academia can do to chart a positive path forward.

Assistant Dean for Advancement Melissa Cassidy

Section: Institutional Advancement

Event Role: Speaker

8:00 AM – 9:15 AM

Room: Churchill D

Join us for a dynamic session highlighting effective stewardship practices across our community. We’ll explore innovative approaches to stewarding small gifts, integrating AI, engaging academic leadership, and elevating donor experiences—from first-time supporters to major gift donors. Come ready to share, learn, and be inspired by creative solutions and real-world examples.

Professor of Law and Director, Disability Law and Policy Program Katherine Macfarlane

Section: Women in Legal Education, Sponsored by Disability Law, Employment Discrimination Law and Law Professors with Disabilities and Allies

Event: Special Programs

Event Role: Speaker from a Call for Papers

9:35 AM – 10:50 AM

Room: Grand Salon Section 3

Women remain underrepresented in influential positions in the legal academy. Visible and invisible status lines and distinctions within and outside of the academy have historically been defined by and through prisms of both discrimination and harassment. These status lines and distinctions bear directly upon career progression and one’s personal sense of safety. They create and, once brought to light, help to explain persistent inequality. This panel will explore harassment and bullying and the wide range of behaviors that constitute them, ranging from more readily recognizable forms of unwelcome conduct such as unwanted sexual advances, comments, gestures, and physical contact, and actions or statements that are obviously threatening, to more subtle or insidious forms of harassment and bullying, such as instances where a staff member’s helpfulness are mistakenly interpreted as interest or where a faculty member engages in alleged consensual sexual relationships with students. In so doing, the panel will employ the framework of intersectionality in analyzing varying forms and examples of harassment and bullying. The panel also may explore the role of institutional policies and practices in perpetuating harassment or bullying as well as the challenges and obstacles that status differences may create in terms of reporting and addressing these harms. 

Dean Terence Lau L’98

Section: Pre-Law Education and Admission to Law School

Event: Section Programs

Event Role: Speaker

1:00 PM – 2:15 PM

Room: Grand Salon Section 13

The financial aid landscape is rapidly changing. This session will provide research and policy advice to help institutions and different constituents prepare for the new financial aid structure. Research and policy experts will share updates on recent developments and the effect on law school admissions, financial aid, development, and business offices. A law school dean and CFO will discuss institutional impacts and considerations. This session is designed to provide practical advice for navigating a new federal financial aid landscape.

Associate Dean for Faculty Research and Professor of Law Kristen Barnes

Section: International Law, Sponsored by International Human Rights, Law in the Americas, and National Security Law Session

Event: Section Pedagogy Programs

Event Role: Speaker

4:10 PM – 5:25 PM

Room: Churchill B1

January 9

Chancellor and Professor of Law Kent Syverud

Section: Advanced Workshop for Experienced Deans – Post-Decanal Opportunities: Seeking a Presidency of a College of University

Event: Resume

Event Role: Speaker

8:30 AM – 10:00 AM

Room: St. James Ballroom

Professor Katherine Macfarlane Discusses Judge Shopping with Law.com

Professor of Law Katherine Macfarlane recently spoke with Law.com for the article “Judge Shopping ‘Consequences’ Are Worth Keeping Tabs On, Experts Say.” The article examines the trend of judge shopping at the Federal level and sanctions being issued to law firms.

“I think we’re in an era where there’s a little bit more openness about challenging judicial behavior outside of how the merits are decided,” said Macfarlane.

“The thing to keep in mind is that random case assignment is subject to so many exceptions across the federal courts. Random assignment is this exalted principle, but I don’t even know if it’s the default,” said Macfarlane.

Macfarlane covered this topic in her article Constitutional Case Assignment in the North Carolina Law Review Vol. 102.

Professor of Law Emeritus William C. Banks Discusses the Insurrection Act

Professor of Law Emeritus William C. Banks spoke with CNN after the Supreme Court ruled blocking President Donald Trump from sending the National Guard into American cities. This may raise the possibility of the President to invoke the Insurrection Act and the deployment of U.S. troops to American cities.

Banks told CNN that such a move would almost certainly be more politically dicey. “Instead of part-time National Guard personnel, the president could send in the 82nd Airborne in heavy armor and gear and gin up some heavy martial images for our screens,” Banks said.

“There’s only a little bit of daylight between no law and the Posse Comitatus prohibition and the Insurrection Act,” Banks said. “There’s no other space for them to work.”