In his commentary, Banks states that “The Chinese hack of the U.S. treasury is likely just another step in the escalating cyber conflict between the U.S. and China. It is noteworthy that the U.S. was able to openly attribute the hack to a Chinese state sponsor—attribution is not typically straightforward, and our adversaries work hard to cover their tracks.”
Raised in Austin, Texas, Daniel Tyrone L’25 did not come from a family of lawyers. In fact, his happy, suburban childhood was thanks to the hard work of his parents, who ran their own small businesses. His dad had a contracting company, and his mom owned a small restaurant.
“My first real exposure to law was as a kid interacting with lawyers who would come into the restaurant,” he says. “As I started to get some insight into their world, it quickly became apparent to me the complexities of the situations they had to deal with and that that the job of an attorney included mental deep dives into heavy matters—a perception that never left me.”
After graduating from Texas State University, he admits he was a bit lost, but he could “hold a conversation with a brick wall,” which led him to his first professional job as a headhunter. That led him down a career path working in internal recruitment, employee relations and human resources at a number of companies. Today, he is the vice president for human resources for Bishop Lifting Products, Inc., a private equity-backed organization operating in the industrial lift niche. And, while he intends to stay in his current role, he is eager to soon be adding “legal counsel” to his title.
It was his work in employee relations that reignited his thoughts about studying the law. “As an employee relations specialist, your job is to investigate and mitigate any employee-related matters, particularly those with legal ramifications,” he explains. “I found that I really loved exploring basic employment law and enjoyed the research, as well as the opportunity to talk to some of the employment counsel.”
As he grew to better grasp this type of work, he noticed that many colleagues throughout every job function treated the law as a bit of an afterthought, noting that most smaller companies often do not have the luxury of inhouse legal counsel and avoid getting outside counsel due to cost. “I didn’t understand why others avoided researching the law, but I also realized it was an opportunity for me,” he says.
“Working in HR and also being in charge of legal makes me so much more valuable as an employee.”
—Daniel Tyrone L’25
It was the COVID pandemic that amplified his focus on the need for legal counsel in the workplace. He was still employed but stuck at home, so he took a practice LSAT one day. “I scored much higher than I thought I would,” Tyrone says. “So, I decided to run with it. I studied for the LSATs for four months and got a great score.”
Tyrone wasn’t looking for a change in his career path but an enhancement to the one he already had. “Working in HR and also being in charge of legal makes me so much more valuable as an employee,” he says.
However, he knew he couldn’t put his career on hold and, more importantly, he needed to be attentive to his wife and two children, so he sought out a program with flexibility.
“I didn’t know how limited my options were when it came to finding a hybrid law school,” Tyrone says. “I assumed that JD programs were like MBA programs and that every institution would have an online option, but I was wrong. I cannot tell you how happy I was when I found Syracuse Law’s JDinteractive Program (JDi). Not only was it what I was looking for, but it was at Syracuse University! That’s a brand. Everyone from Texas has heard of Syracuse!”
“My classmates are 25 to 60-plus with careers that range from a brain surgeon, a professional gambler, Fortune 500 execs, a news anchor, a farmer and some stay-at-home parents. Words cannot describe how bright the people in my cohort are. That’s the beauty of this program is that it allows those with limited time and many responsibilities to earn their JD.”
—Daniel Tyrone L’25
Now a 3L at Syracuse Law, Tyrone is well on his way to enhancing his HR career. He has nothing but praise for the way the JDi program allows him to juggle law school with the rest of his responsibilities, but his real admiration is for the diversity in backgrounds of his cohort.
“My classmates are 25 to 60-plus with careers that range from a brain surgeon, a professional gambler, Fortune 500 execs, a news anchor, a farmer and some stay-at-home parents. Words cannot describe how bright the people in my cohort are. That’s the beauty of this program is that it allows those with limited time and many responsibilities to earn their JD,” he says. “I’ve made great memories and formed great relationships, and I have the text chains over the past three years to prove it—filled with law theories, debates, sports conversations, parenting advice and more.”
Tyrone looks at his JDi experience as one of the best decisions he ever made and nothing short of “amazing,” as he looks forward to completing his degree and using his hard-earned legal skills in his career.
“I’m not sure I was anything exceptional to Syracuse Law,” he says with humility, “but Syracuse Law was exceptional to me.”
Professor Gregory Germain spoke with The Hill on the possibility of jury nullification for the Luigi Mangione trial, the man accused of fatally shooting UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson.
Jury nullification occurs when a jury returns a not guilty verdict even though jurors believe beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant has broken the law. This may happen when jurors disagree with the law or the punishment.
“I think it’s very unlikely that a case like this is going to confront something like jury nullification,” said Germain. “Most of us hate insurance companies and have had difficult experiences dealing with insurance companies, but that doesn’t mean we think people should be going around murdering insurance executives in the street.”
Germain noted that it’s unlikely potential nullifiers will be able to hide that level of bias during the jury selection process. He adds that while Mangione does have a large fanbase, most “people who want to live in a civilized society are not going to find him to be an appealing defendant.”
This panel will focus on the potential contributions of Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) to socioeconomics and the study of law. In particular, the discussion will consider the role of the state, mechanisms for achieving full employment (including job guarantees), the relationship (or lack of one) between fiscal policy and inflation, the importance of community investment, and how to make these topics accessible and relevant to law students and legal scholars.
In many respects Fourth Amendment doctrine has evolved to expand law enforcement power to act on suspicions, frequently to the disadvantage of disfavored groups. Reversing these patterns is not just a matter of academic interest but a pressing need, amplified with the advent of more intrusive and pervasive surveillance technologies. Participants in this discussion will address the ways that suspicion is defined and constructed, its role (or failed potential) in constraining government power, the need for alternatives to suspicion to regulate mass data surveillance, and the potential for suspicion to serve as cover for bias.
In alignment with the conference theme of Courage in Action, this year’s program will focus on discussing the difficulties older adults experience in accessing basic needs, including healthcare and utilization of health technology; housing, aging in place, and long-term care; employment and retirement; and estate planning. As we age, we face significant life transitions that intersect with the law in these areas as well as others that can be challenging to navigate.
A key goal of the Section is to support our members in every aspect of their careers, including their scholarship. This panel provides section members with the opportunity to present a work-in-progress and receive feedback from senior scholars and other section members.
The Section believes that it is time to re-think the basic relationship between law and economics. Economics was introduced into legal scholarship as a tool for conservative political positions in the 1980s. It is time to recapture this valuable branch of modern knowledge and apply it to pressing topics such as climate change, automation and employment, and the relationships between the underregulation of finance, corruption, instability, and racial inequality. Participants will explore how a combined legal, economic, and social science approach can be productively applied to these topics.
It has been said that a “law degree is a leadership degree” and much has been written on the need for law schools to educate leaders. Fortunately, many legal educators have responded in interesting and courageous ways. Starting with visionaries like Dean Donald Polden and Professor Deborah Rhode–both of whom courageously fought for their vision of leadership development as part of legal education–the field has continued to evolve and grow. Fortunately, leadership development and leadership education–like leadership itself–is not limited to a one-size-fits-all approach. A plethora of different approaches to leadership development have emerged recently with different focuses, tactics, and desired outcomes. In this discussion group, we will discuss and celebrate these different approaches as we look at how law schools can best develop their students into good lawyer-leaders.
The Supreme Court has generally deferred to the president’s judgment to invoke the Insurrection Act, which Trump may use to justify deploying the military to deport undocumented immigrants.
“There isn’t much of a historical set of precedents to interpret laws like the Insurrection Act,” Banks said. “And the reason, ironically, is that the courts have given such a wide berth to the president to make the call about when it’s and when it’s not necessary to use the military.”
The 1807 law, Banks said gives the president “enough discretion that he could drive a truck through” its requirements to deploy the military at home, such as for immigration enforcement.
“The act allows him to do a lot on his own,” Banks added, “with very few procedural hurdles.”
Gabrielle Amaturo L’25, editor-in-chief of the Journal of International Law and Commerce(JILC), was invited to speak at the American Society of International Law (ASIL) Midyear Meeting on the Roundtable for International Law Journal Editors.
Amaturo answered questions about the conference and its impact on JILC.
Why were you invited to the conference?
As the current Editor-in-Chief of JILC, I was invited to speak on behalf of our Journal and to collaborate with others in our field by discussing current events and approaches to running a journal. My attendance would not have been possible without the support of our advisor, Professor Cora True-Frost G’01, L’01, and the entire administration at the College of Law.
What did you learn at the conference?
I learned a lot about the variety of fields that International Law touches. I heard from scholars and professors about their upcoming research publications, and from seasoned legal practitioners about the real-time effects international law and policy have across so many sectors of life.
How will this impact your work on JILC?
From this experience, I was able to take away a deeper knowledge of running a journal and a broadened view of the level of scholarship that is being submitted for publishing. Knowing what legal scholars and professors are researching helps open our eyes to what issues of international law and commerce we want to highlight next.
How will this impact your future legal career?
Personally, this experience showed me the ways legal interests can intersect. As someone who comes from a business background and is now focusing on pursuing litigation while having interests in international law, I saw that there are career avenues that blend it together.
Is there anything else you would like current and prospective students to know about the conference?
I would recommend that students seek out and take up opportunities to attend conferences such as these. It was amazing to listen, learn, and let the legal world know about the amazing programs we have here at Syracuse Law!
First published in October of 1972, the Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce is one of the oldest student-edited international law reviews in the United States.
Beth Kubala, Executive Director of Clinical Education
Over several semesters, student attorneys in the Betty and Michael D. Wohl Veterans Legal Clinic (VLC) worked under the supervision of VLC Executive Director and Professor Beth Kubala to represent the Appellant in Phillips v. McDonough a case adjudicated by the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC). This included many hours of research, outlining, and writing briefs, among other legal tasks.
“This case illustrates the dedication of VLC students to ensure our client received the best legal representation possible, no matter how long the case takes to be resolved. I am also impressed by the work produced by our students which measures up to that of professional law firms and the military.”
—Beth Kubala, Executive Director of Clinical Education
The Appellant in this case was a long-term client of the VLC, first representing him at the VA Regional Office (RO) and before the Board of Veterans Appeals (BVA). This appeal resulted from a BVA decision denying an earlier effective date for the onset of his claim after a 26-year fight to secure veteran’s benefits
“Veterans claims cases can take years to come to a resolution as Phillips reflects,” says Kubala. “This case illustrates the dedication of VLC students to ensure our client received the best legal representation possible, no matter how long the case takes to be resolved. I am also impressed by the work produced by our students which measures up to that of professional law firms and the military.”
VLC students provided written support to their client throughout the legal process that started in 2020. The case was stayed in 2021 due to pending decisions Arellano v McDonough (Supreme Court) and Taylor v McDonough (Federal Circuit) that had major implications for arguments raised in Phillips and impacted the VLC’s strategies and subsequent filings.
“Not only did the law students research, outline, and draft the briefs, but if the case were called to oral arguments, one of the students would have argued it. We knew the contested issues inside and out because Professor Kubala demands excellence from her students, and our veteran clients deserve excellence in our work. After the precedential decisions above, over a hundred hours collectively went into re-strategizing this case to draft a reply brief within the 30-day window of the Secretary’s filing once the stay was lifted.”
—Seth M. Owens L’24
The CAVC issued a Memorandum Decision, on 5/31/2024, remanding the case to the BVA with specific, express instructions to consider certain aspects of the evidence of record when adjudicating the claim for an earlier effective date. Re-adjudication before the BVA is still pending.
Seth M. Owens L’24
Seth M. Owens L’24, now a Staff Attorney with the VLC, worked on the case while a student in the VLC. He noted that Professor Kubala provides her VLC students with a “firm-like” atmosphere that leads to professional growth and experiential learning in the clinic. “Not only did the law students research, outline, and draft the briefs, but if the case were called to oral arguments, one of the students would have argued it,” says Owens. “We knew the contested issues inside and out because Professor Kubala demands excellence from her students, and our veteran clients deserve excellence in our work. After the precedential decisions above, over a hundred hours collectively went into re-strategizing this case to draft a reply brief within the 30-day window of the Secretary’s filing once the stay was lifted.”
Adjunct Professor Jared Landaw recently spoke with Bloomberg after the Fifth Circuit struck down NASDAQ’s rule to compel listed companies to have a more diverse board of directors.
In the article, Landaw said smart companies send a signal when they release information about board diversity. In more than 16 years at Barington Capital Group, including as chief operating officer, he found “many under-performing companies tend to have some form of homogeneousness in the board room that’s either contributed to the problem or prevents the board from self-correcting.” Bringing in directors of different demographic and life backgrounds helped address the problem.
“A majority of S&P 500 companies disclose their diversity statistics, regardless of whether they are traded on Nasdaq,” Landaw said. “I think that’s a reflection of what investors want and have come to expect.”
Sinésio Sambo ’25 LL.M. has been a practicing attorney and human rights activist since 2016 in Mozambique. The combination of private legal practice and corporate in-house counseling with human rights and/or sustainability pursuits are rare in his home country, but Sambo is spending a year in the U.S. earning a Master of Laws (LL.M.) at Syracuse University College of Law in an effort to help change that.
The Republic of Mozambique became independent in 1975 after four centuries of Portuguese rule. Located on the southeast coast of Africa, it is rich in natural resources and both biologically and culturally diverse, but it is also considered one of the poorest countries in the world, ranking 181 out of 189 countries on the Human Development Index. According to Sambo, the culture of Mozambique in relation to human rights and sustainability is, for the most part, a pursuit of local civil society organizations, international NGOs and multilateral agencies.
“I knew gaining multijurisdictional exposure in a richly developed legal system, while qualifying for the New York State Bar exam, would help me reach my goals. And, I was attracted to Syracuse Law for its innovative and student-centered approach to legal education and genuine concern about academic and bar success of foreign-trained attorneys.”
—Sinésio Sambo ’25 LL.M
“While awareness of human rights and sustainability has been increasing over the past few years, the fact of the matter is that there is a not so openly discussed perception that legal practitioners must choose between going into private practice or corporate in-house counseling or going down a more human rights and/or sustainability-related career path,” he explains. “In fact, based on experience, I think that business and human rights are still viewed as mutually exclusive by many fellow legal practitioners.”
According to Sambo, in lawsuits involving large corporations and disadvantaged rural communities, the former are commonly represented by well-established law firms and the latter by organizations that prioritize free legal aid. He suspects that is because well-established law firms and lawyers are not willing to take the risk of losing large corporate clients—and profit.
“Private practitioners seem to forget that our role should go far beyond representing clients. It entails upholding the rule of law even through publication statements against human rights violations,” he says.
From the earliest days in law, Sambo knew that getting an LL.M. would benefit his goals to pursue an international career and embark on global legal practice. While he has a law degree equivalent to an LL.B. from Eduardo Mondlane University in Mozambique and an LL.M. in human rights and democratization in Africa from the University of Pretoria in South Africa, Sambo wanted more. So, when he recently received a Fulbright grant, he headed to Syracuse Law to earn another LL.M.
“I knew gaining multijurisdictional exposure in a richly developed legal system, while qualifying for the New York State Bar exam, would help me reach my goals. And, I was attracted to Syracuse Law for its innovative and student-centered approach to legal education and genuine concern about academic and bar success of foreign-trained attorneys,” he explains.
Since beginning the program, Sambo is pleased with the vast number of resources available to foreign-trained legal professionals in order for them to succeed academically and professionally wherever in the world they decide to practice. He notes the one-on-one mentoring, the free bar prep course and the state-of the art Dineen Hall, as well as the diversity of his cohort, which has afforded him multijurisdictional exposure and allowed him to gain insight and some understanding into how law works in unfamiliar jurisdictions. Sambo has been inspired by a number of others in his cohort, including Igor dos Santos L’25, a “brilliant” mentor from Brazil who is a student in Syracuse Law’s J.D. program.
“There are so many takeaways I will bring back from my experience here at Syracuse Law, particularly highlighting the problem-solving approach that U.S. law takes to today’s pressing concerns in the world and to the constitutional principles, such as separation of power.”
—Sinésio Sambo ’25 LL.M
While Sambo intends to gain some work experience in the U.S. after completing his LL.M. next year, he will eventually return home to Mozambique with the intention of making a contribution to the country’s further development.
“There are so many takeaways I will bring back from my experience here at Syracuse Law, particularly highlighting the problem-solving approach that U.S. law takes to today’s pressing concerns in the world and to the constitutional principles, such as separation of power,” he says.
In the meantime, Sambo is committed to taking advantage of every learning opportunity he can before he completes his LL.M. in 2025. He says, “My experience at Syracuse Law is helping me focus on business-related legal disciplines in order to become an expert combining both business and human rights—and allowing me to be the change I want to see in the world.”
When you attend a concert or baseball game, it’s become routine to go through a metal detector or be screened by security, but most people don’t think about what goes on behind the scenes to make sure that large venues, like stadiums, airports or government entities, are safe from acts of terrorism, cybersecurity breaches or other risks that impact the public. Thankfully, Akmal Ali L’06 and his team at Aluma think about it every day.
In recognition for the success of Aluma, a risk management and security consulting firm founded by Ali, Syracuse University recognized him with a ‘CUSE50 Alumni Entrepreneur Award in November. In its second year, the ‘CUSE50 awards recognize 50 fastest-growing alumni businesses owned or led by Orange graduates University-wide.
The son of Afghan refugees, Ali was born and raised in Florida. He always had two dreams: go to law school and live in Washington, D.C. He’s achieved both, but his determination to do so brought him to Syracuse Law along the way.
The events of 9/11 left a permanent impression on Ali, who was an undergraduate at Rollins College at the time. So, when he decided to pursue law school, he chose Syracuse Law for its program on national security and counterterrorism law. Along the way, he discovered a mentor in now Professor of Law Emeritus William C. Banks, founder of the Syracuse Law’s Institute for National Security and Counterterrorism (INSCT).
Although he enrolled at Syracuse Law, Ali never intended to become a practicing attorney. Instead, he wanted the skillsets of critical thinking and problem solving that came from a law school education.
After earning his J.D., he went straight to work at the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in his dream city of Washington, D.C. In response to the 9/11 attacks, the U.S. government created the DHS, and Congress enacted the Support Anti-Terrorism by Fostering Effecting Technologies (SAFETY) Act, which incentivizes private companies to do more to reduce risk exposure.
Ali began as a research associate for the SAFETY Act Office at DHS. Two years later, he was named deputy director responsible for public and private partnerships, working in sports and large venue security, cybersecurity, risk management, mass transit security and more in collaboration with federal and state government agencies like the Department of Defense and the State Department. Ali was, in fact, vital in expanding the SAFETY Act program within the private sector, and today his work remains a primary feature of the program.
However, as Ali grew in his role with DHS, he began noticing that applications for SAFETY Act awards were primarily coming from the private sector, which could be better served by a consultant who understood both the security best practices and the legal background needed to traverse the DHS application processes. He knew he could do better, so with his degree from Syracuse Law and experience at the DHS, Ali entered the private sector at an existing consulting firm.
“To assist someone in getting a SAFETY Act award, you have to be a really good risk manager and security expert to help your clients with best practices, as well as offer recommendations and identify emerging technologies,” Ali explains.
Ali’s first client was the New York Yankees. Next came the New York Mets, and soon Ali was working with other sports teams, as well as venues like airports, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey and Madison Square Garden. He also starting giving security input during the design process of venues yet to be built.
In 2019, he founded Aluma. “I knew I had the experience, so I decided to hang out my own shingle and bet on myself,” he says.
“I’ve put a lot of work into my business, but much of my foundation was built at Syracuse Law. I soaked up so much information on counterterrorism and the law and learned skill sets that allowed me to create a business that is helping to keep people and places safer—and that’s very rewarding.”
—Akmal Ali L’06
Today, clients such as the NFL, Live Nation, and MGM Resorts come to Aluma to leverage its expertise in order to pursue benefits from the SAFETY Act with the priority of keeping people safe while still allowing for an outstanding guest experience.
Ali notes that security focuses have changed throughout his career. After 9/11, the biggest threats on people’s minds were sophisticated attacks of terror like the strikes on the World Trade Center, but, today there are other threats to be mitigated.
“What we’ve seen the most over the last decade are bad actors going for the low hanging fruit—less sophisticated actions like sniper threats, vehicles ramming into crowds, small firearm or knife attacks, and even drones,” he explains. “The impact might seem smaller, but any of these threats can add up to a lot of damage.”
Recently AI has come into play in the risk and security assessment sector, as technology continues to become more sophisticated and connect everything, everywhere. Aluma is continuously working to utilize AI positively, while also staying ahead of abuse of this sophisticated technology.
“If you’re sitting at 500 camera feeds in a command center looking to spot a bad actor, one person can only notice so much. It’s like finding a needle in a haystack,” Ali says. “But, AI can use video analytics to search thousands of people and then trigger an alert that prompts human action. AI is amazing technology that will eventually be used to help security professionals write or update their security policies, so we’re staying on top of that.”
His vast knowledge of law, government and security threats have certainly put him and his business on top. Ali is proud to have received a ‘CUSE50 award in recognition for the highly successful business he created in Aluma.
“Visiting campus and walking through the new law school at Dineen Hall was a thrill, and it was an honor to come back to the University and receive a ‘CUSE50 award,” says Ali. “I’ve put a lot of work into my business, but much of my foundation was built at Syracuse Law. I soaked up so much information on counterterrorism and the law and learned skill sets that allowed me to create a business that is helping to keep people and places safer—and that’s very rewarding.”
