Crandall Melvin Professor of Law Shubha Ghosh spoke with Politico on the potential Oracle/TikTok deal in the story “Trump’s TikTok-Oracle deal could break the law — but nobody can stop him”.
Oracle shareholders may have standing to sue if the deal negatively affects the value of Oracle stock. However, even concerned shareholders may be unable to stop a deal between Oracle and TikTok from moving forward. Ghosh said shareholder lawsuits typically take place “after the fact,” triggering only once a deal is agreed to and later goes sideways.
(Syracuse, NY – March 24, 2025) The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit will hold oral arguments at Syracuse University College of Law on March 28 from 10 to 11:30 a.m. The oral arguments are free and open to the public. Seating is limited.
The court session will be held in the Melanie Gray Ceremonial Courtroom in Dineen Hall, 950 Irving Avenue, Syracuse, NY 13244.
The cases to be argued are Keri Spring, et al v. Allegany-Limestone, et al and United States of America v. Allen R. Clark.
In addition, Director of Legal Communication & Research and Teaching Professor Aliza Milner will hold a lecture on the appellate process on March 28 at 9:30 a.m. in Dineen Hall. The lecture is open to all.
No cell phones, laptops, cameras, or video recording devices will be permitted in the courtroom during arguments. The College of Law will not be able to store any items.
About the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is one of the thirteen United States Courts of Appeals. Its territory covers the states of Connecticut, New York, and Vermont, and it has appellate jurisdiction over the U.S. district courts in the following federal judicial districts: District of Connecticut. Eastern District of New York. Northern District of New York. Southern District of New York, Western District of New York, and District of Vermont.
The U.S. Court of Appeals sits just below the Supreme Court of the United States in the judicial branch of the federal government.
The Princeton Review (TPR) has recognized Syracuse University College of Law’s JDinteractive (JDi) online J.D. program as one of the best Online J.D. Programs in their 2025 rankings. JDi is an established program with six years of experience in delivering online legal education designed for working professionals.
The program has more than 200 alumni and approximately 300 students currently enrolled. Alumni include doctors, compliance officers, national security leaders, and public advocates, among others.
Students in JDi can add an online MBA to their online J.D. through Syracuse University’s highly ranked Whitman School of Management. This first-of-its-kind program provides the educational basis for leaders to tackle today’s growing intersection of law and business and address complex transactions, rapid regulatory changes, and important compliance issues.
JDi features short in-person courses (“residencies”) 4-5 days in length throughout the program to provide unparalleled professional opportunities in places around the country and the world. The residencies feature College of Law alumni and noted leaders in various legal fields that provide real-world insights into today’s pressing legal topics.
Professor Nina Kohn, an internationally recognized scholar in Elder Law, leads an Elder Law residency held in Washington, D.C.
“Syracuse Law’s JDinteractive program is the ideal place for busy working professionals to earn a J.D. that fits their schedules,” says Associate Dean of Online Education Shannon Gardner. “We are seeing our graduates use their law degree to advance their careers, tackle new challenges, and be leaders in their communities.”
Crandall Melvin Professor of Law Shubha Ghosh spoke with Bloomberg Law for the article “Denial of Copyright to AI ‘Author’ Affirmed by D.C. Circuit” which assesses the impact of the decision in Stephen Thaler v. Shira Perlmutter on Artificial Intelligence and copyright.
Ghosh. Director of the Syracuse Intellectual Property Law Institute, acknowledged unintended features can become a part of a work, noting copyright doesn’t have an intent requirement. But he also said there’s a different degree of human involvement with more traditional tools, and that the AI itself provides much more creativity and originality than the human author by comparison.
It’s challenging to sort out the degree to which a user prompt contributes to an AI output, he said.
“How do you determine it, and who determines it?” he asked.
David M. Levy L’48 Professor of Law Nina Kohn’s article “Ageless Law” was recently accepted for publication by North Carolina Law Review. It is forthcoming in 2026.
From the abstract: As states respond to the overturning of Roe v. Wade and concerns about retrenchment of federal civil rights protections, they are considering expanding state constitutional protections against discrimination—including age discrimination. Indeed, in November 2022 and 2024 respectively, Nevada and New York voters overwhelmingly voted to amend their state constitutions to add age as a protected class. It is in this political environment that this article asks a simple question that is, remarkably, largely unexplored in the legal literature: should law be “ageless”?
Professor Gregory Germain spoke with Newsweek for an assessment of President Trump’s court cases that challenge the 14th Amendment’s guarantee of citizenship to anyone born in the United States.
Germain said that Trump’s lawyers will have to focus on the second phrase of the citizenship clause, arguing that children born in the US to illegal aliens are not “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States.
“That seems like a question that will ultimately have to be decided by the Supreme Court. Trump can argue that the phrase about being ‘subject to the jurisdiction’ must have meaning and should be read as a limitation on birthright citizenship,” Germain told Newsweek.
“The Supreme Court will have to decide whether children of illegal or temporary residents qualify, and whether an interpretation by executive order rather than statute is effective.”
Dean Terence Lau L’98 recently spoke with the media on the impact of rapidly changing tariff policies on the automotive industry.
Lau, a former trade expert for Ford, noted that automakers are looking for a consistent policy, which is not what they have witnessed in recent weeks as tariffs on Canada and Mexico were switched on and off, and as Trump continues to threaten higher tariffs on others.
“It’s impossible to keep up with day-to-day or week-to-week changes,” he said. “The auto industry makes plans months in advance, if not years. So it’s just impossible to plan.”
But he said the Detroit Three are sure to keep up their behind-the-scenes lobbying efforts in coming weeks and will continue to seek a “partnership with the administration” where both sides can come away with something from the tariffs, and tariff threats.
“I mean, there is a shared goal here, which is American competitiveness and profitability of American car companies,” Lau said. “That is a shared goal. Well, how do you reach that without creating what Farley calls a giant hole in the U.S. auto industry?”
Glenda Criss L’28 and Sarah Peck L’28 recently placed second in the Northeast Regional of the National Patent Application Drafting Competition. The competition is hosted by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Criss and Peck, students in Syracuse Law’s JDinteractive online J.D. program, were coached by George McGuire ‘91 L’96, a Member of Bond, Schoeneck, and King, and an Adjunct Faculty member at Syracuse Law since 1998.
The competition involves taking an invention statement and conducting a prior art search, developing a search strategy, drafting a complete patent application, and drafting a summary of the search strategy and the claim drafting strategy. The competition also had the students write an information disclosure statement (a statement under 37 CFR 1.56 required by patent applicants to disclose material prior art), prepare a slide presentation, and give an oral presentation and Q&A session before a panel of judges.
“The competition is, in essence, a 2 to 3 credit course on patent preparation/prosecution that Glenda and Sarah took on at the end of the fall semester of their first year of law school and worked on diligently over break and subsequently competed against other northeast law schools in February,” explains McGuire.
Following the oral presentations, the top three rated schools out of the nine in the region advanced to the regional finals where they were required to conduct a second round of presentations before a larger panel of judges. The College of Law was amongst the top three scorers from the opening round and advanced to the Regional Finals where Syracuse Law finished second.
“Needless to say, Glenda and Sarah did a tremendous job. Their determination, unbelievable work ethic, and brilliant legal work reflect very positively on Syracuse Law. Neither of these students had any prior experience with intellectual property law, let alone patents and patent application preparation and prosecution. They studied, learned, and remarkably applied their skills. They are both destined for great legal careers!” says McGuire.
Criss and Peck are very grateful for McGuire’s coaching. McGuire is a registered patent attorney and member of Bond’s intellectual property and technology practice. “We competed against teams of 2L and 3L students who have a more solid grounding in patent work and were able to finish in 2nd place. The judges indicated that one of our claims was so well drafted that it could likely be approved right away! This is largely due to George’s guidance and support. We have learned so much through this process, and we cannot express our gratitude enough.”
Dean Terence Lau L’98 was impressed by the students’ strong results. “Your dedication to mastering complex patent application concepts in such a short timeframe is truly impressive. Taking on this challenge during the end of the fall semester and over break demonstrates exceptional commitment to your legal education. The judges’ comments about your draft claims being potentially approval-ready speak volumes about the quality of your work. You took the initiative, you learned a great deal, and you demonstrated how powerful Syracuse Law can be on the national stage.”
Lau was also thankful for McGuire’s mentorship. “I cannot thank you enough for volunteering your time and expertise to coach our students. Your approach of guiding rather than doing the work for them exemplifies the best of legal education. The weekly meetings and patient mentorship made a tremendous difference in helping Glenda and Sarah navigate unfamiliar legal territory. This achievement highlights the caliber of our students and faculty at Syracuse Law.”
Professor Robert Nassau, director of the Sherman F. Levey ’57, L’59 Low Income Taxpayer Clinic, commented on the Wallet Hub 2025 Tax survey’s finding that two out of three people describe tax preparation companies that advertise free tax filing services as “bait-and-switch” schemes.
In the CPA Practice Advisor, he reacted “Some are, some aren’t. There are definitely free tax filing services (I’ve helped people use them), but one has to be careful when using them not to be ‘tricked’ into paying for something they don’t need. And sometimes people expect more from the service than the service is willing to provide for free; to me, that’s not really what I would call bait and switch.”
Growing up in southeastern Pennsylvania as the son of a small-business owner, John Lawrence saw first-hand some of the challenges faced by family-run businesses. Later on, he didn’t agree with some of the decisions coming out of Pennsylvania’s capital in Harrisburg, so in 2010 he decided he could best serve his community by throwing his hat into the ring to run for the House of Representatives as a Reformer. In 2011, Lawrence was sworn in to serve the 13th Legislative District, located in Chester County, and he hasn’t looked back.
“Serving as an elected official is humbling and a great honor,” says Lawrence, who is now in his eighth term.
A graduate of Penn State University with a degree in business, Lawrence has built a reputation for bringing a common sense approach to state government. He has authored bills to consolidate redundant government services, reform budgeting practices and even require state legislators to submit to drug tests. Putting his words into action, Lawrence refuses to take a state pension, per diems, drive a state vehicle or take advantage of other perks that come with the job.
This past session, Lawrence authored floor amendments to be sure citizens are aware of their right to counsel, that disabled veterans receive constitutionally mandated property tax relief and that police officers working in some of the most challenging areas in the state are rewarded. He has also had legislation signed into law to ensure victims of domestic violence are not required to financially support their convicted abusers during an ongoing divorce.
Outside of work, Lawrence is active in his church and community, and he and his wife are heavily involved in their two children’s high school activities.
With all of that going on, how is Lawrence possibly going to law school? Through the JDinteractive program at Syracuse University College of Law.
After college, Lawrence went to work at J.P. Morgan Chase as an account officer. Pursuing law was in the back of his mind, and he knew a legal background would be helpful in his line of work. After transitioning to politics, he considered part-time traditional law programs, but they were either too far away from his family and community or conflicted with his other obligations. So, when he discovered Syracuse Law’s hybrid JDi program, Lawrence thought it just might work.
“I did a lot of research before applying and visited the campus several times,” he says. “Before making the commitment to law school, I wanted to make sure I could make it work with my schedule. The JDi program gave me the flexibility to make it happen.”
Today, he is taking asynchronous classes and completing other tasks and activities online around his busy schedule through Syracuse Law’s JDi. He notes that one of the best things about the program has been the other students in his cohort.
“The caliber of others in my cohort is remarkable,” he says. “It’s such a diverse group with very different life experiences—a doctor, a dentist, several working on Wall Street. These people have great perspectives and bring some interesting experiences to the program. Most tend to be a little older than those in traditional law school, and, in a way, it’s helpful that we’re all dealing with the pressures of career, family, community and more. I think I’ve learned as much in law school through the others in my cohort as I have from my professors.”
Living about five hours from Syracuse University, Lawrence has attended several residencies on campus, including one on cryptocurrency just a few months ago. Now a 2L, he is preparing for higher level classes, and while he intends to keep serving the people of Pennsylvania, Lawrence also knows that a degree from Syracuse Law will allow him to expand his work and make him a better policymaker.
“Enrolling in the Syracuse Law JDi program was a great decision,” Lawrence says. “People might wonder if a hybrid online program can be engaging and rigorous, I can assure you that the program at Syracuse Law is both. I know that my experiences during the program and attaining a law degree will help me in ways that would not otherwise have been possible.”
